Browse all practice questions for the Irish Criminal Law King's Inns Entrance Practice Exam. Search by topic, open any question and review its full explanation, then test yourself in the practice quiz.

Irish Criminal Law King's Inns Entrance Practice Exam course image
More practice questions

These questions are part of the practice quiz. Start practicing

  • What was significant about the priest's actions in The People (AG) v. McGrath (1960)?
  • What was the significance of AG for Northern Ireland v. Gallagher concerning intent and intoxication?
  • What aspect of theft is addressed by s8(7) of the Criminal Justice (Theft and Fraud Offences) Act 2001?
  • In AG v. Dunleavy, what led to the quashing of the manslaughter conviction?
  • In the ruling of R v. Thornton, how are prolonged situations relevant to provocation?
  • What recommendation did the Law Reform Commission make in 1995 regarding self-induced intoxication?
  • What factors must a court consider under section 4(4) of the Criminal Justice (Theft and Fraud Offences) Act 2001?
  • In the context of R v. Burgess (1990), how was somnambulism classified?
  • What does s7(1) of the Criminal Justice (Theft and Fraud Offences) Act 2001 cover?
  • In Doyle v. Wicklow CoCo (1974), what distinction was made regarding legal and medical insanity?
  • What must a prosecuting body establish in sexual assault cases concerning the accused's intent?
  • What type of legal responsibility does a person assume when they take care of another individual as seen in R v. Stone and Dobinson?
  • In Barker v. R (1983), what was the accused's relationship to the house he was involved with?
  • Which of the following accurately describes the nature of assault according to Irish criminal law, as seen in the cases provided?
  • How does the penalty increase for repeated offences against minors under the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences) Act 2006?
  • What was significant about the entry method in R v. Ryan (1996) concerning burglary?
  • Under s8(7) of the Criminal Justice (Theft and Fraud Offences) Act 2001, what constitutes 'making off without payment'?
  • In R v. Cheshire (1991), under what condition would negligent treatment break the chain of causation?
  • What was the outcome of the case involving a man who stabbed his wife in front of their children while knowing she intended to leave him?
  • What circumstances are considered external factors for non-insane automatism in R v. Quick?
  • Which of the following actions would be classified under s6(1) of the Criminal Justice (Theft and Fraud Offences) Act 2001?
  • In the context of manslaughter, what does the presence of a defendant signify?
  • What was a significant requirement identified in In Re A (Children) for the application of necessity?
  • What does R v. Dickie (1984) indicate about the connection between knowledge of actions and the insanity defense?
  • What aspect did R v. Pagett (1983) highlight about police conduct?
  • What aspect of mental health was explored in DPP v. O'Mahony (1986)?
  • In Clifford v. DPP (2008), what behaviour was highlighted as potentially breaching the peace?
  • According to AG v. Dwyer (1972), what is the outcome if someone uses more force than necessary but believed it was appropriate?
  • In R v. Thornton, what does provocation allow for in continuation of a defense?
  • What is a defining feature of the sado-masochistic practices referenced in the cases discussed?
  • In the case of R v. Holzer, what was the primary factor in determining the outcome?
  • In the case of DPP v. Kelly (2000), what is emphasized as the prosecution's responsibility?
  • What was the deception involved in R v. Flattery (1877)?
  • In R v. Bernier (1998), what was noted about the accused's intent when touching patients?
  • According to The People (DPP) v. CM, what crime was primarily discussed in relation to recklessness?
  • What does ‘common design’ refer to in criminal law?
  • In R v. Clarkson (1971), what was the reason Ryan could not abandon the doctrine of common design?
  • What condition regarding intoxication was addressed in R v. Camplin (1845)?
  • What does the test for non-insane automatism require according to O'Brien v. Parker (1997)?
  • In R v. Roberts, what was determined about the victim's actions after the assault attempt?
  • What does the Criminal Law Amendment Act 1935 state regarding sexual offences against people under 15?
  • What does the principle of doli incapax imply for children under the age of 7?
  • Which statement best represents how provocation is assessed in legal cases?
  • What is defined as harassment under section 10(1) of the 1997 Act?
  • What is a necessary factor for the defense of duress as established in R v. Hudson and Taylor (1971)?
  • What constitutes an offence of intoxication under the Criminal Justice (Public Order) Act 1994?
  • What was the outcome of R v. Ireland (1997) regarding silent telephone calls?
  • In the case of R v. Clouden (1987), what is noted concerning the alleged victim?
  • In what instance can a presumption of intention be rebutted?
  • Which of the following is a criterion for an act to be classified as sexual in nature?
  • According to the examples provided, which case involved a conviction for handling stolen property despite the withdrawal of a larceny charge?
  • What was determined to be a disease of the mind in R v. Hennessy (1989)?
  • Which key factor is considered in the applicability of necessity as a defense?
  • How did the courts generally respond to consensual acts associated with sado-masochism based on the cases provided?
  • In DPP v. Fowler, what action led to the accused being charged?
  • What did Lord Scarman express in R v. Hancock and Shankland regarding probabilities and intention?
  • Which of the following characteristics cannot be considered by the jury when determining the provocation defense for an accused?
  • What was the outcome in the case of Impress Ltd v. Rees (1971)?
  • In R v. Williams (1923), what justification did X provide for engaging in sexual activity?
  • What type of penetrative actions are included under s4(1) of the Criminal Law (Rape) (Amendment) Act 1990?
  • In R v. Mowatt, what was the accused charged with after retaliating during a robbery?
  • In R v. Dickie (1984), what was the accused's understanding regarding the act committed?
  • In DPP v. O'Loughlin, what was the basis for the accused's belief regarding the muckspreader?
  • What must be demonstrated for someone to be convicted of aiding and abetting in a crime?
  • Under the Criminal Justice (Theft and Fraud Offences) Act 2001, which action is directly addressed?
  • What is required for an affray to exist under section 16(1) of the Criminal Justice (Public Order) Act 1994?
  • What is the primary concern of the law regarding threatening, abusive, or insulting behaviour?
  • What constitutes the legal interpretation of "consent" under the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences) Act?
  • In R v. Jones (1999), what was notable about the accused's actions during the incident?
  • What does the Criminal Justice Act 1990 mandate as punishment for murder?
  • According to the Criminal Law (Insanity) Act 2006, when is an accused person deemed unfit to be tried?
  • In the case of R v. Fitzpatrick, what was the key issue regarding the defendant's defense?
  • What is the key element needed to prove accessory after the fact?
  • What type of behaviour does section 6(1) of the Criminal Justice (Public Order) Act 1994 address?
  • What constitutes burglary according to s12(1) of the Criminal Justice (Theft and Fraud Offences) Act 2001?
  • Which requirement must be met to successfully argue "not guilty by reason of insanity" according to R v. McNaghten?
  • According to DPP v. Beard, what allows for the reduction of murder to manslaughter?
  • What constitutes sufficient provocation leading to voluntary manslaughter?
  • According to section 9(1) of the 1997 Act, what constitutes coercion?
  • What significant event occurred in the case of R v. McNaghten that led to changes in legal standards for insanity defenses?
  • In R v. Brown (1985), why was the man's conviction for burglary upheld?
  • What scenario does section 11(1) of the 1997 Act address?
  • What key factor determined X's responsibility in R v. Malcherek; R v. Steel?
  • What must the prosecution prove in The People (DPP) v. McBride to maintain the presumption of intention?
  • What factor did the court consider in R v. Hallet (1969) regarding causation?
  • What legal concept does "automatism" involve in the context of criminal conduct?
  • What was the reason provided by the accused in R v. Martin for driving despite being disqualified?
  • According to the distinction made between insane and non-insane automatism, what primarily differentiates them?
  • What was the detrimental outcome for the accused in Doyle v. Wicklow CoCo (1974) concerning the ability to stop an act?
  • What constitutes the crime of theft under the Criminal Justice (Theft and Fraud Offences) Act 2001?
  • Which action is described in Section 2(3) of the Criminal Damage Act 1991?
  • What factor is crucial in determining whether an act is involuntary in the context of automatism?
  • What does s14 of the 1935 Act address regarding consent?
  • What intent does Section 2(2) of the Criminal Damage Act 1991 focus on?
  • What is a key takeaway from the King v. AG (1981) ruling?
  • What was the primary outcome of AG v. Manning regarding self-induced intoxication?
  • What must be demonstrated regarding the accused's conduct in murder cases?
  • In the case of R v. Stone and Dobinson, what led to the manslaughter charges against Stone and his mistress?
  • Which elements must be proven to secure a conviction for sexual assault?
  • What constitutes innocent intoxication according to the provided context?
  • What legislative act governs the handling and possession of stolen property in Ireland?
  • In R v. Jordan, why was X found not liable for Y's death?
  • What is the requirement for children under 10 regarding criminal responsibility in serious crimes as per the Children Act 2001?
  • What was the ruling regarding the negligent treatment in R v Cheshire (1991)?
  • What type of conduct was addressed in the ruling of R v. McKechnie (1991)?
  • According to section 14(1) of the 1997 Act, what action is considered endangering traffic?
  • What was the central issue in R v. Wilson (1996)?
  • In the case R v. Ahluwalia, what factor may influence the validity of a provocation defense?
  • What is a key factor in determining the legality of consent as noted in the cases presented?
  • Under the Criminal Law Amendment Acts, which statement is true about consent?
  • What type of property damage involves intent to defraud, based on the Criminal Damage Act 1991?
  • What was the outcome of the trial regarding duress in DPP v. Walsh and Conneely?
  • In the context of robbery, what distinguishes it from theft as per DPP v. Mangan (1995)?
  • What defines robbery as per section 14(1) of the Criminal Justice (Theft and Fraud Offences) Act 2001?
  • In R v McKechnie (1991), what ultimately caused the victim's death?
  • How does the court view self-induced intoxication in basic intent crimes?
  • What was a critical aspect of the ruling in The People (DPP) v. Hull regarding intent?
  • What term describes the conscious decision to take a risk in legal terms?
  • According to the Law Reform Commission on Provocation, which statement reflects an important criterion for provocation?
  • In R v. Linekar (1995), what type of promise was made that did not affect consent?
  • When can intoxication play a role according to AG v. Manning?
  • What does the term 'abets' refer to in a criminal context?
  • In which situation can the court decide to dismiss criminal proceedings against a child under 14 years old according to the Children Act 2001?
  • In The People (AG) v. Gallagher (1972), what was the main reason for upholding Gallagher's conviction?
  • What defense is applicable when Y robs a bank due to threats from X in a duress situation?
  • Which principle was emphasized in the aftermath of the Criminal Damage Act, 1971?
  • What legal principle is illustrated by R v. Clouden (1987)?
  • In R v. Kingston, what crime did the accused commit against the boy?
  • What characterizes an affray according to the Criminal Justice (Public Order) Act 1994?
  • Which type of mens rea involves awareness of a risk of harm?
  • Under the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences) Act 1993, what types of individuals are protected from sexual offences?
  • In Reid v. DPP; Kirwan v. DPP (2004), what was determined about the actions of the accused?
  • What conclusion was reached in R v. Kennedy regarding manslaughter when supplying drugs?
  • In R v. Elbekkay (1995), what led to the conviction of X?
  • In The People (DPP) v. Davis (2001), what was established regarding the applicant's actions and the victim's death?
  • In R v. Willer, what action did the accused take to evade a perceived threat?
  • What was established in R v. O'Connor regarding self-induced intoxication?
  • In the case of R v. Camplin, how does provocation relate to trials beyond murder charges?
  • In the case of R v. Gillard (1988), what act of poisoning is highlighted?
  • According to s9 of the Criminal Law (Rape) Amendment Act 1990, what does lack of resistance indicate?
  • What is the concept of endangerment as noted in section 12(1) of the 1997 Act?
  • Which acts are included under the Punishment of Incest Act 1908?
  • In cases involving consent, what is generally required for it to be considered valid?
  • Which scenario can lead to a charge of voluntary manslaughter?
  • What must be proven for a killing to be classified as murder under the Criminal Justice Act 1964?
  • What must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt to defeat a provocation defense in DPP v. MacEoin?
  • What must be proven for the defense of intoxication to be successful in a case like R v. Kingston?
  • What must the jury determine regarding the accused's conduct for it to be considered provoked?
  • In the case of In re a Ward of Court, what condition was the ward in before the feeding tube was withdrawn?
  • What did DPP v. Majewski confirm about intoxication as a defense in murder cases?
  • In the context of the discussed cases, how is the concept of consent crucial to determining the legality of actions?
  • How did The People (DPP) v. Hull influence the understanding of intent in accidental shootings?
  • What was the conviction against X in DPP for NI v. Maxwell (1978)?
  • How does AG v. Whelan (1934) relate to the relationship between duress and criminal liability?
  • How did the court address the morality of not assisting in the survival of a conjoined twin in In Re A?
  • In DPP v. O'Neill, what was crucial to the outcome of the case?
  • What was highlighted regarding victim culpability in The People (DPP) v. Davis (2001)?
  • What fundamental issue is addressed in the Criminal Law regarding sexual offences against children?
  • Which of the following is NOT a form of duress recognized in Irish criminal law?
  • What aspect of intention did the courts examine in R v. Maloney?
  • What type of sexual activity was central to the case of R v. Brown (1994)?
  • What is the maximum sentence for rape under the Offences Against the Person Act, 1861?
  • What was the significance of the R v. Roberts case in relation to voluntary actions by victims?
  • Under what condition does a person have a defense for innocent intoxication?
  • In R v. Rabey (1977), what condition did the accused experience after being dumped?
  • To secure a conviction for accessory after the fact, which condition must be proven?
  • In DPP v. MacEoin, provocation can only reduce which charge to a lesser offense?
  • What is the maximum relationship degree defined in the Punishment of Incest Act 1908 for illegal sexual conduct?
  • What was the condition highlighted in DPP v. Davis regarding self-control?
  • What action is addressed under section 7(1) of the 1997 Act?
  • What is not required to prove an attempted rape according to AG's ref (No 1 of 1992) (1993)?
  • What was a notable outcome of the DPP v. Fowler case regarding the burglary charge?
  • In the context of necessity as a defense, what must be proven for an acquittal?
  • What does aggravated burglary involve?
  • What did the Supreme Court determine in DPP v. Barnes (2007) regarding initial aggressors in violent confrontations?
  • According to R v. Kennedy, under what condition is a supplier of drugs not liable for manslaughter?
  • What does section 8(1) of the 1997 Act exempt from prosecution?
  • In legal terms, what is the age of presumed incapacity for children under the law?
  • What does s4(1) of the 1997 Act specifically address?
  • In the ruling of R v. Nedrick, what is the court's stance on murder convictions?
  • In R v. Edwards, what was the primary reason the court denied the provocation defense?
  • What duty do cohabiting spouses owe each other according to The People (DPP) v. O'Brien?
  • Under what conditions is offensive conduct considered an offence according to the Criminal Justice (Public Order) Act 1994?
  • What did the ruling in R v. Cunningham establish regarding malice?
  • What is required for an act to be classified as a Riot under section 14(1) of the Criminal Justice (Public Order) Act 1994?
  • What did the ruling in R v. Duffy state about provocation?
  • What was the outcome for the soldiers in the Attorney General's Reference (No 1 of 1975) case?
  • According to Hegarty v. Shine (1878), how does fraud regarding venereal health affect consent?
  • In R v. Pommel, what was claimed as the reason for possessing a machine gun?
  • In AG v. Crosbie and Meehan, what initiated the fatal incident?
  • What is the primary concern of endangerment laws within section 12(1)?
  • What does the Criminal Justice (Theft and Fraud Offences) Act 2001 say about trust property?
  • What does section 12(1) of the 1997 Act specifically mention regarding poison?
  • According to the Criminal Justice (Public Order) Act 1994, what does obscene display in public refer to?
  • What was the outcome in R v. Campbell (1991) when the accused was found near a post office with an imitation firearm?
  • What precedent was established in King v. AG (1981) regarding convictions?
  • According to the Children Act 2001, what is the minimum age of criminal responsibility in cases of murder and manslaughter?
  • According to R v. Maloney, how should juries evaluate intent?
  • In R v. Kemp, what physical condition was cited as contributing to the accused's mental state during the crime?
  • What was the main reason for Pittwood's liability in R v. Pittwood?
  • Under the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences) Act 2006, what is the first-time maximum penalty for a person in authority?
  • What does section 11(1) specifically deal with?
  • What is a characteristic of duress as a legal defense in criminal law?
  • What was the pivotal issue in the case Airedale NHS Trust v. Bland regarding patient care?
  • What constitutes Violent Disorder as per section 15(1) of the Criminal Justice (Public Order) Act 1994?
  • In R v. Miller, what action led to the conviction for arson?
  • What did AG v. Hayes (1967) establish about the accused’s knowledge regarding his actions?
  • In the case Hyam v. DPP, what did the House of Lords state regarding intention?
  • In the case of R v. Kirby (1961), what was the outcome concerning the guard's actions?
  • What was the significance of the lighted cigarette in R v. Miller?
  • What is the maximum penalty for engaging in sexual acts with a child under 17 as per the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences) Act 2006?
  • What was the charged offense in R v. Loughnan involving escaping from prison?
  • What type of disease was identified as a "disease of the mind" in R v. Sullivan?
  • What does the defense of necessity include according to the guidelines presented?
  • What type of acts fall under the definition of intimidation in section 7 of the 1997 Act?
  • Why was the conviction upheld in R v. Emmett (1999)?
  • What is the general principle established in s4(2) of the Criminal Justice Act, 1964?
  • What test for obscenity was established in R v. Hicklin (1868)?
  • What was a primary outcome from R v. Parks (1992) concerning sleepwalking?
  • What is the significance of the case DPP v. Morgan (1976) in relation to rape convictions?
  • In R v. Dawson and James, what was pivotal to uphold the robbery conviction?
  • Which of the following best describes the presumption of doli incapax for children over the age of 7 but under 14?
  • What common theme is present in the cases R v. Brown, R v. Emmett, and R v. Wilson?
  • In Airedale NHS Trust v. Bland, what was the court's finding regarding the withdrawal of life support?
  • What constitutes aggravated sexual assault under s3(1) of the Criminal Law (Rape) (Amendment) Act 1990?
  • According to s6(1) of the Criminal Justice (Theft and Fraud Offences) Act 2001, which of the following describes a method of deception?
  • What legal principle relates to the assumption of responsibility in R v. Stone and Dobinson?
  • What does the concept of provocation aim to consider according to DPP v. Kelly?
  • Which of the following cases highlighted the significance of impersonation in consent?
  • According to the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences) Act 2006, what is the age consideration for a person over 17 regarding sexual activity with a child under 17?
  • What is required for a charge of unlawful act manslaughter according to R v. Kennedy?
  • What principle was applied in the case of R v. Williams and Davies regarding the hitchhiker's actions?
  • In the context of manslaughter, what does "inadvertently causing death" refer to?
  • Under which circumstance is provocation negated according to the guidance from the Law Reform Commission?
  • What defines a ‘trespasser’ according to the legal context within these cases?
  • In AG's reference (No 2 of 1983) (1984), what does the court state about keeping petrol bombs in a shop?
  • When raising a necessity defense, what is essential for the accusation to succeed?
  • What was the result of the conviction appeal in R v. Woollin regarding indirect intention?
  • What was the outcome in the Attorney General's Reference (No. 3 of 1994) regarding the accused's action?
  • In the scenario of Duress by Circumstances, what motivates Y to rob the bank?
  • What is the definition of arson according to the Criminal Damage Act 1991?
  • What type of threatening behavior is covered under s5(1) of the 1997 Act?
  • Which act legally introduced the defense of diminished responsibility in Ireland?
  • What is a key aspect of the test for provocation according to DPP v. Mullane?
  • What does the term "force" entail in the context of robbery?
  • In R v. Woollin, how was the concept of oblique intention introduced?
  • In the case of R v. Dudley and Stephens, what was the primary reason the jury convicted the accused of murder?
  • Under the Criminal Justice Act 1990, which of the following is classified as murder?
  • What was the conclusion reached by the House of Lords in R v. Kingston regarding the mens rea for sexual assault?
  • According to The People (AG) v. Ryan (1966), what is the liability of a person merely present at a crime?
  • What role does public perception play in defining sexual assault cases according to the case law?
  • Which section of the Criminal Justice (Public Order) Act 1994 addresses obscene displays?
  • What was established in R v. Court (1989) regarding perceptions of sexual acts?
  • In R v Pagett (1983), why was the shooting not considered a novus actus interveniens?
  • During which time is offensive conduct especially regulated according to the Criminal Justice (Public Order) Act 1994?
  • In which case were the soldiers found not guilty for the actions that occurred in their presence?
  • What does Section 2(1) of the Criminal Damage Act 1991 define?
  • In Irish Criminal Law, what does the term 'mens rea' refer to?
  • In R v. Collins (1973), what was determined as necessary for a conviction of burglary?
  • What principle did Collins v. Wilcock (1984) establish regarding physical contacts in ordinary life?
  • In the context of R v. Hennessy (1989), what external factors were mentioned regarding stress and depression?
  • What must be proven for self-induced intoxication to be considered a defense in a crime involving basic intent?
  • In R v. Santana Bermudez, what did the policeman's action of searching lead to?
  • In cases involving recklessness, what criterion is used to establish a person's guilt?
  • What did DPP v. Courtney (1994) clarify about diminished self-control?
  • In AG for Jersey v. Holley, what does provocation acknowledge?
  • In R v. Atakpu, what was the central issue regarding the accused's actions?
  • In DPP v. Egan (1989), what did X do that led to the charge of procuring drunk driving?
  • According to s6(1) of the 1997 Act, which type of attacks are specifically mentioned?
  • In R v. Bailey, when is self-induced non-insane automatism not a defense?
  • What are the two criteria for determining intention according to Ormerod's summary?
  • In the case of R v. Kingston, what was the status of the accused regarding intoxication at the time of the offense?
  • What can be inferred from R v. Hudson and Taylor regarding the immediacy of threats?
  • What did the court rule in Laskey and Ors v. UK (1997) regarding their activities?
  • In the case of AG v. Grey, what was the ruling regarding the employee's belief about the items taken?
  • What did the court conclude regarding causation in R v. Hallet (1969)?
  • What is the legal significance of "the accused acted in self-defense" for voluntary manslaughter?
  • Which aspect of the Children Act 2001 allows for a rebuttable presumption of incapacity?
  • Which type of penetration is explicitly excluded from s4 of the Criminal Law (Rape) (Amendment) Act 1990?
  • What happened to the victim in R v. Flynn (1867) after he was injured?
  • What does the lawfulness of using fatal force in self-defense depend on according to AG v. Keatley (1954)?
  • What outcome resulted from the case of R v. Blaue regarding the refusal of medical treatment?
  • What was the nature of the threat in R v. Abdul-Hussain when hijacking the airplane?
  • What was the result of the staged wedding in R v. Papadimitropolous (1957)?
  • What age is defined as the age of criminal responsibility under s52(1) of the Children Act 2001?
  • What is the standard for assessing whether a person's behaviour is offensive conduct under the Criminal Justice (Public Order) Act 1994?
  • What principle was discussed in DPP v. Kelly regarding insanity defenses?
  • Which of the following actions is defined as a lawful excuse for damaging property?
  • Under the Criminal Law Act 1997, when might someone be liable as an aider and abettor?
  • What conclusion did Lord Coleridge CJ reach regarding the defense of necessity in R v. Dudley and Stephens?
  • What does the term 'innocent intoxication' refer to in the context of criminal law?
  • What did DPP v. Reilly determine about voluntary intoxication and its relation to non-insane automatism?
  • In cases of dishonest appropriation, what must be true for an accused to potentially avoid conviction?
  • In the case of The State v. Walden, what is the court's stance regarding parents' responsibilities towards their children?
  • How can the presumption of doli incapax be rebutted for children aged 7 to 14?
  • What does self-induced intoxication fail to provide a defense for, according to R v. Caldwell?
  • What does the phrase "engages in conduct which creates a substantial risk" refer to in The People (DPP) v. Cagney?
  • What was ruled regarding the use of duress in AG v. Whelan (1934)?
  • According to R v. Larkin, what constitutes manslaughter in the case of accidental death?
  • What was the outcome of the case R v. Santana Bermudez concerning the accused's statement to the police?
  • In R v. Giannetto, what constitutes active encouragement of a crime?
  • What legal concept protects an individual from charges of theft when acting on mistaken belief?
  • What was the intent of the accused in DPP v. Mangan (1995) when he smashed the window of the car?
  • In the context of recklessness, what does a person need to be aware of according to the provided definitions?
  • According to DPP v. Kelly, what is essential for a provocation defense to be valid?
  • Under section 10(1), which form of communication is considered harassment?
  • Which legal principle from R v. Blaue emphasizes the concept of an ‘eggshell skull’?
  • In The People (DPP) v. Murray, what was necessary for a conviction of capital murder regarding the off-duty guard?
  • How does the law view the use of force in self-defense in cases of mistaken belief according to DPP v. Barnes (2007)?
  • In the case of R v Smith (1959), what caused the victim's death?
  • In R v. Giannetto (1997), what action demonstrated counselling?
Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy